Friday, March 12, 2010

Safe as Houses

Obsessive micro-managing

Is it just me or are the Republicans in Atlanta growing more and more obsessed with micro-managing the day-to-day affairs of your social life ... all the while deliberately removing responsibility and obligation from big business across the state?

Fueling this ongoing meme is a recently approved House bill that bans teenagers from speaking on their cell phone while driving. While it's hard to argue that speaking on one's phone doesn't add another level of distraction for folks, I also have a knee-jerk reaction to any sort of attempt to curtail the ability of folks to ... you know ... do what they want to do behind closed doors (even if they are moving while the doors are closed).

Granted, teenagers are easy to pick on largely because, well, they can't vote and have limited First Amendment rights (and, let's face it, have a lot to learn about life). Still, something about this feels really wrong to me. It just seems that there's some willful glee exhibited by some conservatives whenever the topic of government serving as parent comes up. I mean, for years I've heard that we need to be in the business of letting parents take responsibility for raising their children, educating their children and disciplining their children.

And then something like this comes along.

Again, it's not that I don't concede that there isn't a measurable amount of distraction that goes hand-in-hand with speaking on your phone while driving, but I'm just very hesitant to say we need legislation that absolutely forbids this type of behavior.

At what point do we start hearing folks saying 'well you can't eat while your driving' or 'don't sip that Big Gulp while rolling down I-85' or 'you're gonna face a $100 fine for changing the radio channel' ... because all of those things are just as equal distractions.

 

Um ...

Color me stunned.
   

Programming update

While posting will be light through the remainder of the weekend as I prepare for a conference in Columbus, I also want to highlight some programming changes on my end ...

- I plan to launch two new blogs, though one isn't terribly new. That one will be focused on local news and commentary affecting Athens-Clarke County and Oconee County. With what we're trying to do here at Tondee's Tavern, it just didn't make sense to force in an opinion on Oconee County's school board or what a local band or business might be doing in downtown Athens. Beyond The Trestle will serve as a return to the old format of Safe As Houses with a greater focus on local analysis and commentary.

- In addition, I'm working with Mike Hamby to launch an online version/blog of his project The Athens Believer. It will be largely a community-based blog (so we're looking for writers) that deals with the non-profit community in Northeast Georgia, the schools and the faith community. Hopefully we can get some movement on that front within the next week.

- Also, Flack and I really want to start incorporating some New Media elements into Tondee's Tavern. We talked for a while about this a week ago, and putting on weekly podcasts and vodcasts is still very much on our radar. The two challenges right now are time and technology, and we're optimistic we can address both of those in the next month.
   

If that's your argument ...

Granted, I don't really have a definitive opinion either way regarding the English-only tests for obtaining a driver's license. It seems somewhat silly to me if the test is adminstered digitally, though I can understand an economic argument against holding various copies of multi-language tests on file in a particular office.

That isn't the point of this post, however. What is the point is D.A. King's spectacular misunderstanding of the Tower of Babel story from The Bible ...

D.A. King, president of the Dustin Inman Society, an anti-illegal immigration group, spoke in favor of the bill, saying it’s necessary for public safety.

He also mentioned the biblical Tower of Babel, and said those who want to give the exam in many languages are in favor of “tearing the country apart and creating chaos.”

While King's got the basic understanding of the story down - that God disrupted the building of this tower by causing the various people to speak in a multitude of languages - I don't think he understands that his usage of the tale would lend itself to argue against his point of view.

The builders were acting in defiance of God and aimed to construct a building that was not for worship of God, but rather the glory of man. As a result, God confused the people by making them speak different languages, thus effectively ending the construction and scattering mankind across the globe.

The feelings of folks regarding the validity of the story or whether it not was an actual event that occurred doesn't matter. The point was that the chaos resulting from the multitude of tongues being spoken was a good thing, not a bad thing. The society needed to be torn apart ... and King's building his argument alongside those who were acting in sin.

Just seems to be a rather strange way to get your point across.
   

Repeating again

While I think tax incentives to hire unemployed workers is a step in the right direction, I still think it's a rather ineffective strategy given the worsening economy. I've argued this before, but a tax credit - even one that's valued at $2,400 over two years - for each unemployed worker hired by a business just isn't a large enough incentive to justify expanding one's operations.

Again, a dramatic lack of demand is one of the primary causes of this recession. That lack of demand has resulted in falling revenues for businesses of all sizes, and that means cutting back on expenses and downsizing of the number of workers (as evidenced by this Atlanta Journal-Constitution article showing the impact of the crisis on state legislators). Less revenue then means businesses can't make investments in expanding their operations as they're struggling to just maintain the levels needed to keep the doors open.

Offering a tax incentive that might cover less than 20 percent of the cost of creating even the most low-paying of jobs, then, isn't a good enough reason to take on the risks of expanding your operations. Businesses will hire new workers when enough demand has returned to the market to justify such an expense, and, by that time, all this policy will do is merely subsidize logical actions taken on by said businesses anyway.
   

Appropriate comparisons

Just for some perspective regarding the Oconee County Board of Education's proposal to jack up their salaries in the middle of the year without a public hearing, let's take a look at a comparable school system in Georgia.

Columbia County, which features a population of 92,000-plus, has 17 elementary schools, eight middle schools, four high schools and an alternative school. It pays its chairman $10,000 per year and its remaining board members $6,500 per year.

Oconee County, which features a population of 32,000-plus, has four elementary schools, one primary school, two middle schools and two high schools. It's seeking to see the salary for its chairman raised to $10,000 per year with the remaining board members making either $6,000 or $7,000 per year.
   

Oconee BOE opts for a raise

Mother of Mary ....

Because the natural response to a pair of dramatically mishandled situations and a pressing budget crisis is to vote to give yourself a pay raise that is five times greater than what you currently make.

(Oconee County Board of Education Chairman David) Weeks believes the potential raise is well-deserved.

“I think a lot of people think we show up the first and second Monday of the month, but we do a lot more than that,” said Weeks. “It is a lot of work being on the school board. It takes away from the family. And it takes away from your business. But none of us do it for the money.”


Um, if you're not doing it for the money ... they don't ask for a pay raise!
   

The Giveaway's admirers

Following up a little bit on Flack's thoughts to The Great Georgia Corporate Giveaway, it's painfully clear that Rep. Jerry Keen doesn't have the foggiest idea what makes good policy ... or how to effectively defend your own ideas ...

House Majority Leader Jerry Keen, like other tax-cut proponents, couldn’t give chapter and verse on the proposals’ benefits Friday. But generally speaking, he said the cuts will help an ailing economy.

“I know this,” Keen said. “Now is the time to lower the tax burden. It is certainly not the time to raise the tax burden.”

As I try to swallow the simmering rage that results when it dawns on me that such incapable people are actually running our state, let's work through Keen's logic a little bit. First off, the man can't name the benefits from the elimination of the corporate tax ... largely because the purported benefits - when placed in the context of our existing budget crisis and evaluated against similar efforts which have largely failed to produce the intended results - don't actually exist.

Of course, since Keen can't think of a single reason why this proposal would be a good thing, aside from repeating stale talking points (which, these days, is the norm for most Republicans in Atlanta), he opts to completely change the narrative entirely and absolutely make up an opposing argument to rebut ... which is 'well, by gosh, we surely can't raise taxes.' Granted, no one is actually suggesting we raise the corporate tax, but that's besides the point when you're peddling irrational economic fear.

And, if you're Keen and all you're interested in doing is selling what is no less than a boon for big businesses in Georgia - coming right on the heels of the other boon we just gave them via the The Georgia Power Ponzi Scheme - it's important to not deal with 'facts' or 'data' or 'statistical evidence' or 'rational thought' when making your arguments.

   

The Broun survey riddle

Being a constituent of Rep. Paul Broun, I find it hard to believe that he's going to spend less than he did on mail in 2008 ... particularly if the first piece of mail is any indication. it's a four-page, 8.5 x 11, full color mailer on cardstock. That kind of thing is, well, expensive.

And it's not aimed at to 'just to stay in touch with his constituents and hear back from them' largely because, based on the enclosed survey, it's clear Broun knows what he wants to hear back from you. The first question is simply 'Would you have voted for the $825 billion 'stimulus' plan?' and the second one is 'What do you think puts America on a path towards economic recovery?' with the following options ...

Providing tax relief for families and small businesses
Elminating earmarks and corporate spending
Offering significant tax reform like the Fair Tax
Reducing spending across the board except for defense
Giving a 5 percent across-the-board income tax cut
Making the lower 15 percent rate on capital gains and dividends permanent
Providing tax filers with their fair share of the $825 billion stimulus bill
Unleashing America's ability to produce energy (nuclear, clean coal, solar)

You ever wonder how Broun keeps getting surveys that say '90 percent of my constituents support my plans' ... well, if you load the survey with bogus answers, that might explain it. Safe to say, when I registered my complaint with Broun's office that there was no place for me to check 'the stimulus bill is a step in the right direction' or 'increasing spending on social programs and infrastructure investment' I wasn't offered instructions on what to do next.
   

On another note ...

Granted, profound misinterpretations of the Book of Revelation are big business propositions in American culture, it's hard to accurately describe how awful Apocalypse: Caught In The Eye Of The Storm is.

Aside from obviously shaky theology, it's also just a really, really crappy movie ... that I can't turn away from.
   

I agree

Safe to say, this is spot on ...

When the crisis is a rapid and catastrophic drop off in demand, you handcuff the one force that can create demand (i.e., the federal government) in the throes of the contraction. That's insane. Levels of stimulus are a decent question. Intensifying the contraction is just insane and frankly a joke. It's time to recognize that the only debate here is happening among Democrats and sundry non-affiliated sane people. The leaders of the GOP are simply not part of the conversation.

I agree. Why do rational people insist on giving them a platform when it's painfully obvious they have no real intention of working to alleviate the actual crisis gripping our nation? These folks are absolutely irrelevant, and I think it's way past time we treat them as such.
   

Page 7 of 34