Sunday, March 21, 2010

Battlegrounds: The Payback

The desire was real, and the anger was well placed.  To activists of any political party, little does more to boil the blood than a well placed investment that gets turned against you. 


This is the 2nd preview in a series of 6, where we look at the state legislative races we believe have the highest probability of changing hands from Republican to Democratic control.

Party switching is certainly nothing new, but to those who invested time, money, and emotions helping elect Rep. Mike Jacobs (D R-80) to the Georgia House of Representatives, the flip was nothing short of a gun shot to the stomach.

The definitive account was best captured by YDG President, Jason Cecil:

With our encouragement, he decided to make a run at this seat, now House District 80. The seat had long been held by a Republican who had recently died, and Mike's opponent in the general election was the namesake son of that representative. Mike's campaign was COMPLETELY staffed and run by Young Democrats. All of us who worked on that campaign spent countless hours making phone calls, helping with town hall meetings, flyering the district, and going door to door. The district had a Democratic performance of 52%, which made it a swing district. We faced an uphill fight, and the state party gave us no chance of winning. We were truly on our own.

Capitalizing on help from the Democrats, Jacobs was elected in 2004 by a slim margin - capturing 51% of the vote.  But soon, Jacobs arrived at the Gold Dome as a member of a political party turned out of power for the first time since reconstruction.  And even though Rep. Jacobs cruised to an easy victory in ’06 - with over 60% of the vote - the pull of power and majority status was too much for him.  The deed was done, June 2007.

(Photo Credit: Shelbinator)
The 2008 race to extract revenge against Jacobs was an unmitigated disaster.  Lured by the prospects of a young, self-funded businessman, many Democrats quickly fell behind newcomer Keith Gross.  The field was cleared and the battle was joined.  And then it all unraveled.  Keith Gross wasn’t just a political newcomer; Gross couldn’t even prove the simple residency requirements necessary to run for office.  Adding insult to injury, candidate qualifying had passed, virtually ensuring a free ride for the political switcher.  Rep. Jacobs ultimately faced and defeated Michelle Conlon, a Democratic Party proxy who ran as an Independent, in the general election.

Now Rep. Jacobs is a well entrenched incumbent, having been re-elected twice by large margins running as Republican and a Democrat. 

Can Mike Jacobs be beaten?

The obvious answer to that question starts with the prerequisite of fielding a candidate that can withstand vetting, can articulate a message that resonates in the district, and who can raise the necessary money to compete against a well funded incumbent.  In short, it means doing the exact opposite of what went down in 2008.

As far as the district is concerned, and not withstanding the rules of incumbency, the 80th may potentially be the swing district in Georgia.

The 80th is represented, in parts, by 2 popularly elected State Senators from both parties (40th Weber – R, 42nd Adelman – D).  The district has also split down the middle in the last 2 presidential elections (see inset)*. 

The key to performing well will hinge on the competing partisan power centers of the district; the more Republican precincts in the north, versus the more Democratic precincts in the south.  Any candidate will have to bring home voters in left leaning precincts where both Obama and Jacobs garnered over 50% of the vote.  And to the extent possible, any Democrat will have to find a way to make in-roads in the solid right instincts of Dunwoody and precincts in the north.

While the jury is still out on the ability of Democrats to effectively recruit and mobilize against Jacobs, if the Democrats have any hopes of gaining ground in the legislature, we will have to compete and win in reachable districts like the 80th.

(* Note:  It it possibe that given the early voting/absentee advantage of the Obama campaign, he may well have won the 80th.  Since those numbers are not reported by precinct in DeKalb, we will never know.)


 

Previous Battlegrounds:

The Tough Nut to Crack - Rep. Jill Chambers

Up Next:

The Trend Races - Rep. David Casas (R-103), Rep. Rich Golick (R-34)

The Dark Horse District - House District 153

Candidates Matter - Katie Dempsey (R-13)

(All data was pulled from an analysis of precinct election returns that can be found on the secretary of states website. Care was taken to distiguish between vote totals on election day, and early/absentee numbers that may not be reported by precinct.)

Comments (10)add comment
TheUnknown285: ...
Keith Gross is running again. His DOI was filed June 10. He has a different address that looks to be in district (although possibly cutting it close). However, if you google the address, the results say Sunglasses Hut.
1

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 16, 2009
Votes: -1
Tondee's Tavern: ...
You have got to be effin kidding me...
2

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 16, 2009
Votes: +1
Dave Bearse: ...
One of the interesting aspects of the 81st is the low numbers of ballots cast, due at least in part to the large immigrant population. The district has been among the bottom six of 180 districts in votes cast for House Rep, something of special note when there's been another name on the ballot, when up ballot races have been competitive in the district.

Gay voters may cast a larger fraction of ballots in the district than might be expected, not necessarily because there's a particular concentration, but because there are relatively few votes cast. Jill garnered a lot of free publicity in that quarter as the only General Assembly member of the GOP to vote against the gay marriage referendum.
3

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 16, 2009
Votes: +0
Dave Bearse: ...
Reps like Jacobs and Chambers are responsive and accessible to voters, and are well-tuned to their voters with respect to local matters. A good state-level platform, not local issues or the candidate charisma, is the key to these districts.
4

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 16, 2009
Votes: +0
awb2116: ...
This is not good. "Sunglasses Hut" Gross probably shouldn't run again. Does anyone think he has a chance? If so I am all for him but can't Democrats do better than this?
5

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 17, 2009
Votes: +0
TheUnknown285: ...
Re: Gross:
I don't know how damaging the residency debacle would be to him in a general election. And the issue I brought up before makes me wonder if it will happen again.

Re: Other races to look at.
Take a gander at the 109th district (which goes from West-Central Henry to East-Central Henry and includes McDonough). We made huge gains in Henry and it's getting more diverse. Plus, we already have a candidate there (former party chair Jim Nichols).
6

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 17, 2009
Votes: +0
flackattack: ...
re: gross.

i don't think the snafu of 06 has any relevance in a general election - other than highlighting his lack of roots in the district. it does occur to me though that this is a perfect place to demonstrate the usefulness of primaries.

i don't think clown car primaries of 4-7 people are helpful, but a nice, tightly focused, primary with 2 or 3 candidates could be very useful here. nobody should have the deck cleared for them in this district. let them campaign and prove some ability before we invest everything.

the fact that everything was invested in gross, and we had no alternative when he flopped was a massive fail in a number of respects. that just can't happen again.
7

report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 17, 2009
Votes: +0
Dave Bearse: ...
A delayed response as I've been out of pocket for a while, but you're right on about "nice, tightly focused, primary with 2 or 3 candidates". Loved the "I don't think clown car primaries of 4-7 people are helpful" was a chuckle.
8

report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 02, 2009
Votes: +1
madem: ...
It is absolutely necessary that we defeat Mike Jacobs this time. He is the worse kind of politician that you can ever encounter. He is a double-faced whore of a politician.

It is absolutely necessary that we find a viable candidate who knows the district, has some name-recognition, who can start canvassing the district this summer (parties and BBQs to introduce him/herself for instance), who can get the backing of the small business community, and who can start raising money.

And we, who have absolutely been enraged by the treason of Mike Double-faced Jacobs, have to start combing his record since he was elected--roll call votes, every piece of literature he has ever written, every piece of legislation he has ever written and/or sponsored, statements, character, and his taxes. The big huge construction in Brookheaven did not happen without someone sticking its fingers in the honey pot. There are rumors that need to verified. And if we can't confirmed those rumors, we need to spread them anyways.

We have to destroy this traitor political career for good and show him that you don't stab the hand who fed you without consequences.

We can win this with organization, organization, organization and turning out base out.
9

report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 15, 2009
Votes: +2
TheUnknown285: ...
Heads up:

Jacobs draws another Democratic opponent. Her name is Sandra Murray. A quick bit a research shows her to be the owner of Abrakadoodle, some sort of arts and crafts store, with a donation to Georgia's WIN List.

http://ethics.ga.gov/Reports/Campaign/Campaign_Name.aspx?NameID=6330&FilerID=C2009000361&Type=candidate
10

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 18, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy